in ,

Second Dump Of Twitter Files Reveals CRIMINAL Actions By Executives

Share this:

Twitter executives told Congress they did not “shadow ban” people for their political views. But they certainly did, according to the most recent (second) dump of the “Twitter files,” which focuses on Twitter’s “secret blacklist.”

As relayed by Elon Musk to Bari Weiss, the founder and editor of The Free Press, we learn the following:

“A new #TwitterFiles investigation reveals that teams of Twitter employees build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics — all in secret, without informing users.”

Just a reminder; lying to congress is a criminal offense, but I’m not holding my breath that any of these executives will actual face charges.

(“Truth brings reconciliation,” Elon Musk tweeted on Thursday night after releasing the information. “Twitter is working on a software update that will show your true account status, so you know clearly if you’ve been shadow banned, the reason why and how to appeal,” he added.)

Here is the information released Thursday night, as posted by Bari Weiss on Twitter:

1. A new #TwitterFiles investigation reveals that teams of Twitter employees build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics — all in secret, without informing users.

2. Twitter once had a mission ‘to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.’ Along the way, barriers nevertheless were erected.

3. Take, for example, Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) who argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children. Twitter secretly placed him on a ‘Trends Blacklist,’ which prevented his tweets from trending.

4.  Or consider the popular right-wing talk show host, Dan Bongino (@dbongino), who at one point was slapped with a ‘Search Blacklist.’

5. Twitter set the account of conservative activist Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) to ‘Do Not Amplify.’

6. Twitter denied that it does such things. In 2018, Twitter’s Vijaya Gadde (then Head of Legal Policy and Trust) and Kayvon Beykpour (Head of Product) said: ‘We do not shadow ban.’ They added: ‘And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology.’

7. What many people call ‘shadow banning,’ Twitter executives and employees call ‘Visibility Filtering’ or ‘VF.’ Multiple high-level sources confirmed its meaning.

8. ‘Think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see to different levels. It’s a very powerful tool,’ one senior Twitter employee told us.

9. ‘VF’ refers to Twitter’s control over user visibility. It used VF to block searches of individual users; to limit the scope of a particular tweet’s discoverability; to block select users’ posts from ever appearing on the ‘trending’ page; and from inclusion in hashtag searches.

10. All without users’ knowledge.

11. ‘We control visibility quite a bit. And we control the amplification of your content quite a bit. And normal people do not know how much we do,’ one Twitter engineer told us. Two additional Twitter employees confirmed.

Those are the first 11 of 30 tweets released Thursday night. You can read the rest on Twitter.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments