Special Counsel John Durham just dropped a major bomb about Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann, a key player in the Russia hoax and resulting turmoil and one of the main targets of Durham’s investigation so far.
That bomb is that Durham’s team has uncovered a test between James Baker, the FBI General Counsel at the time, and Michael Sussman, a text that Durham is claiming shows Sussman lied to the FBI about his work on behalf of the Clinton Campaign. That text, dated Sept. 18, 2016, reportedly says:
“Jim – it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availibilty for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own – not on behalf of a client or company – want to help the Bureau. Thanks.”
According to Just the News, Durham’s prosecutors intend on using that test, particularly the part where he says he’s on his own, to prove that he lied. In their words from a recent motion:
“The defendant lied in that meeting, falsely stating to the General Counsel that he was not providing the allegations to the FBI on behalf of any client. In fact, the defendant had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including (i) a technology executive (“Tech Executive-1”) at a U.S.-based Internet company (“Internet Company-1”), and (ii) the Clinton Campaign.”
Why that claim is crucial in proving that he lied is that a year later he admitted that he approached the FBI not on his own, but on behalf of a client, saying:
“We had a conversation, as lawyers do with their clients, about client 1 needs and objectives and the best course to take for a client. And so it may have been a decision that we came to together. I mean, I don’t want to imply that I was sort of directed to do something against my better judgment, or that we were in any sort of conflict.
Getting caught in that lie is bad news for Sussmann. Not only will his credibility in future claims be diminished by being caught, but the text helps Durham prove his case that Sussman originally claimed that he wasn’t doing so on the behalf of any client when he approached the FBI, a claim that Sussman’s lawyers have disputed.
Up until now, they’ve attacked the allegation because Durham relied on only one witness in making it, saying:
“The Special Counsel has brought a false statement charge on the basis of a purported oral statement made over five years ago for which there is only a single witness, Mr. Baker; for which there is no recording; and for which there are no contemporaneous notes by anyone who was actually in the meeting.”
Now, with the text in hand (assuming it’s authentic), Durham can disprove that and show that Sussmann was in fact lying.
They’ve also alleged that even if Sussmann lied, the lie isn’t material. Durham disagreed on that point too. Describing why that lie is material, and thus important, Durham said:
“The defendant’s false statement to the FBI General Counsel was plainly material because it misled the General Counsel about, among other things, the critical fact that the defendant was disseminating highly explosive allegations about a then-Presidential candidate on behalf of two specific clients, one of which was the opposing Presidential campaign.“
This is big new, a major step forward in Durham’s case against Sussmann.
And again we must wait and watch for results. Prayers that we finally get these culprits.
Again it needs to be put into action and arrest and prosecute these TRAITORS. Except that this fraud administration will not allow it and will cover-up the TRUTH to protect their CROOKED asses.
Sadly, the wheels of justice turn very slowly, and he HAS to take his time and get EVERY fact perfect; given the immense opposition levelled against him. Great job – keep it up.
What did we expect from a Clinton Lawyer? The truth? Hillary sends them to take course on Lying under oath. She is the master at it. No surprise here. Move along now.
They do it naturally – I’ll bet it was one of their ilk who invented the lie detector test – something most of them can pass and none of us, except maybe a trained yogi!
Pure bullshit!!! How many times have we seen these hope-giving headlines, only to see not a damn bit of results??? Fool me once, shame on you, fool me a hundred times, shame on me….not buying it!!!
So, given that you seem so good at complaining about others who are actually DOING something; what are YOU doing to improve the situation, personally? Or, are you just someone with victim consciousness, waiting for others to fix all your problems for you? Consider that for a moment. IF the answer is “jack shit”, then you have zero right to complain.
no surprises… waiting for arrests and executions for treason.
While we are waiting how about a game of D&D? Monopoly? Chess? I am sure we have enough time to play best out of
ten.one million? Gotta get me some more of that there popcorn as well! Besides, I may be dead and buried by the time they are arrested and executed for their treason. We may as well make the best of our time.Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.fuljobz.com
Well there is a truth God after all ! You go Durham , you go .
Thank you for the great work by Durham and his team in catching these light-deficient ones in their lies. I know Durham will endure to the end and his patience & thoroughness will prevail.
hillary was hanged at Gitmo for the 9th time this week,, 2 more weeks q tards
I think everyone would be happy to see these perpetrators and anyone that is and was involved in this massive corruption and fraud be hung or life in prison !! This makes Watergate look like a puppet show !! Obama , Hillary , Bill Clinton , Comedy , Baker …….. Should all be in Prison !! What if this was Trump doing all of this ! He would be in prison !! Who is protecting all of these sci bags ?????