WARNING: This Is One Of The Most DISGUSTING And DISTURBING Videos Of CNN Discussing Indiana’s Pro-Life Law

One thing you get used to as a pro-life writer is the near-daily influx of pro-choice talking points that are regurgitated by mainstream media news anchors.

The instances are are too numerous to document in one post, but the latest example comes from CNN‘s “New Day” co-host Alisyn Camerota. On Wednesday, she grilled interviewed state Attorney General Curtis Hill, a Republican, on the recent Supreme Court decision to sidestep the most controversial aspects of a 2016 pro-life bill Mike Pence signed into law when he was governor.

A quick recap:

But the court declined to take up a challenge to a provision blocking abortions on the basis of sex, race or disability, avoiding a major ruling on abortion for the time being.


The court’s order also means that the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that blocked the second Indiana abortion law stands. That law stopped abortions on the basis of the fetuses’ sex, gender or disability. The court stated that it will let lower courts continue to weigh in on that provision.

The fetal remains portion of the law was allowed to stand.

As the Free Beacon‘s David Rutz documented, Camerota went straight for the jugular in her interview with Hill. By the time it was all said and done her line of questioning sounded like it came straight of the Planned Parenthood handbook (or maybe NPR‘s abortion-reporting guidelines?).

Here’s how it went down (bolded emphasis added by me)

“What I want to focus in on is the first part we just described, where Indiana had tried to block women from getting abortions if it were based on a disability,” Camerota said. “I’m just curious about that one. Why would you want a family to have to have a child with a severe disability?”


“Well, the issue that the General Assembly faced was not with regard to the question you posed,” Hill said. “It’s the question of the rights and consideration of the unborn child in terms of discriminatory actions of eliminating that opportunity at life. Making a decision based solely on race or disability certainly is a discriminatory practice, and no decision in terms of whether or not to have a child should be based on that solely.”

“That confuses me, because as you know there are lots of terminations of pregnancies based on the fact that there are severe abnormalities of a fetus. Why would you take away that choice from a family?” Camerota asked.

Hill said it wasn’t about taking away a choice but rather making a decision because the child didn’t have a “particular characteristic.”

Later, Camerota quickly backtracked after she called unborn babies “children”, as Townhall‘s Leah Barkoukis notes:

“The law doesn’t address issues with respect to severe abnormalities that would make a child un-viable,” Hill said to a still-unsatisfied Camerota.

While she already had acknowledged at several points that the end result of a pregnancy is, indeed, a child, she catches herself referring to it as such in the womb.

“Yeah but lots of families make that decision based on — Hold on a second. Lots of families do have to make that decision based on the single characteristic of finding out their children, that their fetus, has a severe abnormality,” she said.

Watch the segments below:

Hillary Clinton came under fire from abortion advocates in 2016 after referring to an unborn child as an “unborn person” instead of a fetus.

Describing an unborn child using anything other than clinical terms like “fetus” is a big no-no in the pro-choice community. Insinuating that the compassionate thing to do in cases where an unborn child has a disability is to give parents the option to terminate the pregnancy is a common talking point for pro-choicers.

Instead of putting a qualifier of sorts in front of her questions like “abortion advocates say”, Camerota, in effect, came off as an abortion advocate herself instead of a neutral anchor just asking questions.

Via RedState

What do you think?

-10 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 10

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 10

Downvotes percentage: 100.000000%


Leave a Reply
  1. younger ladies Who Prefer Older Men

    you will have stereo typed young women who search for older men in Asian dating sites as gold diggers, Which can be true for some, But not for everybody.

    The idea of younger ladies dating older men is age old concept. But so just why? The age old question has been pondered upon by psychologists, may, Talk show owners, senior high school girls at slumber parties, divorced wives, And younger men walking home alone after activities.

    It is an evolutionary tactic for the woman to find the strongest, Most confident man who can monetarily support her and provide her (If she wants to) With genetically top quality children?

    reasonable, Older men come out on top as well as.

    Evolutionarily, It’s the perfect diamond necklace. younger ladies like men who can provide emotionally and financially. and as a result, Luckily for people women, Older men are visual dogs. That is in line. They have shanghai women an eye for pretty young ladies. ( don’t you think it’s amazing?)

    so perhaps, Chemistry relates to the size of the man’s wallet. in, Some younger women would prefer a man who can shower her with the most sought after designer things around.

    you can likely find many younger women who prefer this kind of arrangement, or, Lucky for the girls, There are a lot of affluent older men who are more than happy to shower these women with the finer things.

    And why shouldn’t they? Consenting adults can date and marry diverse reasons.

    all together, Beautiful young women dating poor older men with limited financial means are very difficult to find. attention-grabbing isn’t it?

    it’s always younger girl dates rich man, Not younger girl goes poor man.

    generally, Gold digging is a conditional arrangement in which may be short lived. with, Older men will only hold onto their arm candy if it pleases them. they’ve, obviously, you win, because can always find another young woman to date.

  2. Sister losing custody

    My mom called me this morning to tell me a man showed up late to my family’s house last night and served my sister court papers. My sister’s ex is taking her to court for full custody of my 4 year old niece. She never seriously considered a parent. She did not admire that our mom had 4 daughters and made without doubt we always came first before her own needs and wants. She was the secluded “good one” Growing up and while she hit 18, She moved out of mother and father house without saying a word. We had never gotten along EVER and the next occasion I heard from her was when she sent me a text saying she was 12 weeks pregnant. I had a miscarriage at 7 weeks, And she was dumb enough to say I deserved to lose the baby that was an abomination.

    Fast forward to my sister having a baby. It was hard for me to support her because of the relationship we always had. She was depressed and angry her entire maternity. When my niece was born my sister did not improve and she never bonded with the baby. colombia lady Luckily my niece’s father was so pleased be a dad and took over completely. Meanwhile my sister would just pop pills, Sleep all day and never come out of her room. That started for 3 years. Why my sister’s ex tolerated it and stayed with her, I are unsure. My sister just did can’t you create a motherly bone in her body. she’d say that my niece ruined her life, in your own home awful.

    Things hit a peak when my sister’s ex bought them a house this agreement my sister only lived in for 2 months. She created multiple internet dating accounts and starting seeing numerous men behind her boyfriend’s back. He threw her out of the home and she moved back into my parents house. She told my loved ones that school, perform well, And her multiple boyfriends were her focal points and she would see my niece when she “Had time, I was so damn disgusted with her. I adore my niece and treat her like she’s my own little, My 3 year old thought she was her sister since she was 1. my parents were devastated that my sister could be so selfish; My parents treat their grandbabies like their own and it hurts them to see my sister cast off her own daughter.

    Two weeks ago my sister’s ex gave my parents a heads up about seeking full custody and wanted to reassure them that regardless of what happened, They would still get to see their granddaughter. My mom never told my sister about their conversation but it had been eating my mom up because she knew that it doesn’t matter what she told her, It was within. So my sister is served the reports, Wouldn’t say what was on it other than her ex is seeking full custody with administer visits for my sister because she is mentally unstable. My parents confessed that they knew but didn’t want to get entangled; She said she would not forgive them.

    Im sorry seriously so long, But I am disposition so conflicted. I know that my niece is better off with her dad but I know that my daughter will likely never see her cousin again. i have been previously crying with my mom all day, Because we both know that my sister will miss (Her ex has so much records against her, Its too much) And it is because she just didn’t care about anyone but herself. I’m so angry and sorry in my sister for not being responsible, I embarrass myself for her. I don’t even know what else to feel. I just don’t understand how someone could disregard their child and then act shocked from splits. My family will never be the same now.

    If you read everything, Thank you for finding the time.

    He said he would still let your own loved ones see her and he even gave them a heads up. are there a reason not to believe him? I think he’s doing the right thing. Your sister probably has getting some disorder where she cannot relate to people properly. That poor young child. I would find him and tell him you are embarrassed by your sister and really hope to be a positive female role model for your neice. acknowledge your on his side. Offer to babysit or whatever so he knows you want to be in her life and would never go against any court orders regarding your sister.

    This Internet site provides information of a general nature and is designed for educational purposes only. If you have any concerns about your own health or the healthiness of your child, You should always consult with a physician or other healthcare professional. Please review the Terms of Use before applying site. Your standby and call time site indicates your agreement to be bound by the Terms of Use.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


MAGA WIN: Brian Kolfage And ‘We Build The Wall’ Are Back On Track And Full Steam Ahead!

NC Camping World Business WINS BIG! City Will Change Ordinance And Let Massive American Flag FLY!