After 2 Years, Fauci Finally Admits That Natural Immunity Is Superior To Vax

Share this:

Dr. Anthony Fauci has finally admitted that natural immunity against COVID is actually far superior than any experimental jab will ever be.

In an interview on March 23, 2022, Fauci finally let the following slip:

“When you look at the cases they do not appear to be any more severe [than Omicron] and they do not appear to evade immune responses either from vaccine or prior infection.” reports: What’s critical here is not his debatable claim about vaccines but rather his offhand remark about prior infection. It was tossed off as if: “Everyone knows this.” If so, it is no thanks to him, the CDC, or WHO.

To be sure, everything we’ve known since two years ago – if not 2.5 thousand years – is that immunity from prior Covid infection is real. Vaccines have traditionally been a substitute version of exactly that. Brownstone has assembled fully 150 studies that demonstrate that immunity through infection is effective, broad, and lasting.

Had that messaging been around during lockdowns, the attitude toward the virus would have been very different. We would have clearly seen the present reality from the beginning, namely that endemicity generally arrives in the case of a new virus of this sort due to exposure-induced population immunity. This is how humankind evolved to live in the presence of pathogens.

If we had widespread public awareness of this, the public-health priority would not have been locking down people who can manage exposure but rather alerting those who cannot to be careful until herd immunity in one’s own circle of contacts has been realized via meeting the virus and recovering.

To those who say that is dangerous, consider that mass exposure is precisely what happened in any case, stretched out over two years rather than occurring in a single season. This delaying of the inevitable might be what allowed for variants to emerge and take hold in successive rounds, each new one hitting naive immune systems in ways that were difficult to predict. Flatten the curve amounted to “prolonging the pain,” exactly as Knut Wittkowski predicted in March 2020.

A widespread understanding of natural immunity would have changed the entire calculus of public perception of how to manage one’s life in the face of a new virus. Instead of just running and hiding, people might have considered tradeoffs, as they had always done in the past. What is my risk of infection and under what conditions? If I do get the thing, what happens then? It might also have changed the priorities from disease avoidance and vaccine subsidies and mandates to thinking about the crucial thing: what should people do if they get sick? What should doctors recommend and prescribe?

The neglect of therapeutics figures into this very highly. If people believe that locking down, staying away, masking up, stopping travel, and generally giving up all choices in life were the right way to make a pathogen magically disappear, plus they are under the impression that the risk of severe outcomes is equally distributed across the whole population, plus they believe that 3-4% of the population is going to die from Covid (as was suggested in the early days), you end up with a much more compliant people.

If natural immunity had been rightly seen as the most robust and broad form of immunity from the beginning, and we instead followed the idea of focused protection, the vaccine mandates would have been out of the question.

In other words, the silence of this topic was critical to scaring people all over the world into going along with an unprecedented attack on rights and liberties, thus losing up to two years of childhood education, closing millions of small businesses, and denying people basic religious liberties, in addition to the collapse of public health that resulted in record-breaking alcohol and opioid-related deaths, not to mention lost cancer screenings, childhood vaccinations, and general ill-health both physical and mental.

This stuff is not without consequence. Once might expect some contrition. Instead we get a passing comment and nothing more. After all, frank talk about this subject might be risky: it would imply that their entire mitigation strategy was wrong from the beginning and should never be attempted again.

Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jacques MerdeD
Jacques Merde
2 years ago

The medical midget has a lot to answer for

2 years ago

Mad Fauci needs to admit a LOT more than that.

2 years ago

Herr Fauci must be removed and then once a pvt citizen everyone who has lost a loved one senior citizen should take a course of action. Highest paid federal nut job, makes more than Biden, been in office unelected for 42+ yrs is 82 ys old, will get a pension for life and when he croaks his wife gets the pension, how much did he pay into it under 10%, what is the pension try 400K+ a yr. Plus look at his patents. Since he has never worked anywhere else for these patents he gets MILLIONS from them. How is that possible. In pvt biz we could be on the patent but all monies/profits went to our company. This man, along with collins, birx et al, have set back the peoples trust in Public health for 100 yrs. Just consult a good criminal atty before doing anything and remember illegals, ms13 can do the job for a lot less than you can think. LMAO

2 years ago

Him and that damn klaus shwaub killing millions of people with vaccinations the great reset hope they are charged

2 years ago

If they would have focused on treatment instead of isolation there would have been many fewer deaths. But for whatever reason they insisted on everyone getting vaxed or isolated if contracted till it was too late and the person had to be hospitalized. If it didn’t seem so sinister it would be laughable. What is worse is all the people that denied what they knew about sickness and believed everything they were being told by the “experts” that were consistently wrong.