in

TERRIBLE!TERRIBLE! YUGE!YUGE!

WATCH: NY Times Reporter Caught On Hidden Camera SLAMMING His Colleagues For Fake-News Jan 6th Overreaction

Share this:

James O’Keefe has clearly figured out that all he needs is a beautiful woman posing as a date to open the floodgates of leftists in DC and New York and he’s got a good one tonight: Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg.

Rosenberg is caught dishing on his colleagues who were there during the Capitol riot, suggesting they were overreacting about their experience and saying nobody there thought they were in any danger.

He also suggests that the left overreacted about January 6th and that there were a ton of FBI informants in the crowd attacking the Capitol.

Watch:

Here’s more from PV:

Pulitzer Prize Winning New York Times Reporter: January 6 Media Coverage ‘Overreaction,’ FBI Involved, Event Was Not Organized Despite Ongoing Narrative

  • NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, contradicts his own January 6 reporting: “There were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.”
  • Rosenberg: “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!”
  • Rosenberg: “I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’”
  • Rosenberg: “I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ‘dude come on, you were not in any danger.’”
  • Rosenberg: “These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.”
  • Rosenberg: “They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”
  • Rosenberg RESPONDS: “Will I stand by those comments? Absolutely.”

[NEW YORK – Mar. 8, 2022] Project Veritas published a bombshell video on Tuesday showing Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, speaking about the events of January 6, 2021, in a way that contradicts his own reporting.

Rosenberg, who covers national security matters for the Times, says on the undercover video that “there were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.”

This revelation is a break from Rosenberg’s reporting on the matter where he characterized such a notion of FBI informants in the crowd as a “reimagining of Jan. 6.”

This was not the only time Rosenberg’s commentary to Project Veritas’ undercover reporter directly contradicted his own published words. Despite telling a Veritas journalist that January 6 was “no big deal,” his article says that downplaying the events of that day was “the next big lie.”

Soundbites of Rosenberg published Tuesday show him saying, “They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

Project Veritas founder and CEO James O’Keefe revealed that Rosenberg’s article titled, “The Next Big Lies: Jan 6 was No Big Deal, or A Left-Wing Plot,” was written around the same time as he was making contradictory statements to a Project Veritas undercover reporter.

In the video, Rosenberg also revealed that January 6 was “fun,” a contradiction to his reporting that January 6 was “a violent interruption to the transition of power in American history.”

Rosenberg said, “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there outside and we were just having fun.”

He even appears to make fun of his New York Times colleagues in one soundbite saying, “I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building, and are like, ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’” He adds, “I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ‘dude come on, you were not in any danger.’”

Rosenberg concludes, “These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.”

You know Rosenberg’s phone is lighting up right now from his colleagues that he dished on, which he named in the video, suggesting that they were all overreacting about their experience at the Capitol riot. Dude, the New York Times is going to need another one of those Town Hall sessions so they can all cry about how Rosenberg just triggered them.

So how long do you think he’ll keep his job after tonight?

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter8Piper
Peter8Piper
1 year ago

What kind of journalist butchers English by saying “It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there outside and we were just having fun.” In essence, “Me was having fun.” Did he even graduate from high school? Beyond that, he lies in the piece he wrote for the New York Times, apparently without remorse. What kind of garbage is this so-called human being anyway? He has no education in the English language and he is okay with knowingly writing lies about an important national event. Yellow journalism is nothing compared to what he engaged in when covering the Jan. 6 event. He needs to be prosecuted and then his mother needs to take him over her knee and whip the living daylights out of him… in public !!