If You’re an iPhone User Who Is Sick of Overpaying For Apps, You May Want To Read This

Share this story:

The U.S. Supreme Court weighed a lawsuit Monday alleging Apple Inc. has monopolized the market for iPhone apps, with hundreds of millions of dollars in the balance.

From Daily Caller:

The high court is not deciding the merits of the antitrust case — rather, it will decide if the lawsuit can go forward at all. Though a federal trial judge in California dismissed the case, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said it could go forward, prompting an appeal to the Supreme Court.

The app market is essentially a closed system for consumers. Apple iPhones are programmed so they cannot download apps outside the Apple-administered App Store, and users who modify their devices to download apps from other sources — called jailbreaking — risk adverse consequences like voiding their warranty. What’s more, Apple may remove apps from its store for any reason whatever, and requires that all prices are set on a .99 scale, like $1.99 and $2.99.

When an application is purchased, Apple collects a 30 percent commission and gives the other 70 percent to the developer.

Taken together, the plaintiffs say this constitutes an unlawful monopoly: consumers are forced to purchase apps in a digital storefront Apple controls, and end up paying higher prices because developers price in the 30 percent commission Apple collects, effectively passing the burden on to consumers.

That 30 percent commission was at issue in Monday’s case. Under a 1977 Supreme Court precedent called Illinois Brick Co., no cause of action exists for consumers to whom costs were passed on as the result of an alleged monopoly. Only direct purchasers — the consumers overcharged in the first instance — may sue.

Apple says the app developers, not the iPhone users, are the direct purchasers here, so the case should be dismissed.

Furthermore, Apple says they are not actually selling products in the App Store. Rather, Apple is acting as an agent facilitating transactions between users and developers.

“We are hopeful the Supreme Court will recognize Apple’s critical role as a marketplace for apps, and uphold existing legal precedent by finding in favor of Apple and the millions of developers who sell their apps on our platform,” Apple said in a statement.

Leave a Reply