As most any liberal will tell you, if there were no guns in the world, then there would be no gun violence. Because as far as the libs are concerned, no one will ever have a gun at all if they are totally outlawed.
Those of us in the real world know that not only is that the case, but that responsible gun owners are often around to STOP those people who only wish do harm.
From Conservative Tribune:
“Bad guys with guns can only be stopped by good guys with guns,” goes the saying. And it was decidedly true in Sutherland Springs, Texas on Sunday.
The unidentified local gun-wielding citizen reportedly engaged in a brief gunfight with the shooter before chasing him from the scene.
The killer then dropped his gun and fled. He was found dead following a short car chase.
Now, some will argue that the shooting would never have happened at all if guns were prohibited.
But, the problem with that logic is that criminals don’t obey the law.
If liberal gun controls were in place, the only person in Sunday’s scenario who wouldn’t have been armed was the law-abiding citizen who prevented more loss of innocent life.
The shooter, Devin P. Kelley, most assuredly would have still found a way to get a gun.
In fact, Kelley had been dishonorably discharged from the military, which by law prohibits him from buying firearms in Texas.
Gun control was already in place for Kelley, and still he was armed!
What do you think? Would disarming everyone make it harder for criminals to get guns, and all gun violence would be stopped? Or does having “good guys with guns” make it harder for gun-toting bad guys to do more damage?