in ,


BREAKING: Court Delivers Devastating Ruling Against Corrupt Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg

Share this:

Alvin Bragg got smacked down in court this week. Those words will be welcomed by many Americans who have watched Marxist architects of a cultural revolution build a two-tiered system of justice in the United States over the past decade.

Here is the sad news for the corrupt George Soros-backed DA who has been hunting President Donald J. Trump in order to try to keep him from running for President in 2024:

Media reports show that a former prosecutor for the Manhattan district attorney’s office, Mark Pomerantz, must appear for a deposition before the House Judiciary Committee, despite Bragg’s hysterical rant that doing so would hurt his case against Trump from the DA’s office.

Details of a Wednesday afternoon show that U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil sided with the arguments presented by the US House Judiciary committee, led by Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who said that bringing  Pomerantz in, in a probe on the activity of Bragg, was lawful and proper.

Martin Walsh reported on more of the details for Conservative Brief, adding:

“The committee and its chairman, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), had subpoenaed ex-assistant district attorney Mark Pomerantz to give testimony about the DA’s investigation into Trump, 76, that culminated in the former president’s indictment in March. Bragg filed suit against Jordan and the Judiciary Committee, claiming the subpoena was an overreach by the GOP-led House and an attempt to influence a state criminal proceeding,” the New York Post reported. “But Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil found the subpoena was issued with a valid legislative purpose and that it was not the role of the federal judiciary to dictate how Congress operates.

“Mr. Pomerantz must appear for the congressional deposition. No one is above the law,” Judge Vyskocil wrote in an opinion issued after a Manhattan federal court hearing.

Pomerantz is scheduled to appear for the deposition Thursday morning — unless Bragg’s office secures a delay from a federal appeals court.

Walsh reported:

Earlier this month, Bragg sued Jordan to demand he stops “interfering” in a local prosecution.

But as quick as he filed his lawsuit, a judge for the Southern District of New York refused to even file a temporary restraining order, Mike Davis of The Federalist Society reported.

“Soros-funded Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s (frivolous) lawsuit against House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan is already off to a bad start for Bragg: The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York declined to even enter a temporary restraining order,” he said, showing a screenshot of the decision.

“Summary of Soros-funded Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s (frivolous) legal argument: Congress is interfering in Bragg’s misuse of federal funds and misuse of federal law to politically interfere in the next presidential election,” he said.

David appeared on the War Room, on Real America’s Voice, with Steve Bannon to discuss more of the details:

In his suit, Bragg alleged that Jordan and the committee are attempting to wage an intimidation campaign over the indictment, Walsh reported, citing a Fox News report.

The D.A. said he’s taking legal action “in response to an unprecedently brazen and unconstitutional attack by members of Congress on an ongoing New York State criminal prosecution and investigation of” Trump, Fox News reported.

Fox News noted further:

Bragg, a Democrat, is asking a judge to invalidate subpoenas that Jordan, the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, has or plans to issue as part of an investigation of Bragg’s handling of the Trump case.

In recent weeks, the Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena seeking testimony from a former prosecutor, Mark Pomerantz, who previously oversaw the Trump investigation. The committee has also sought documents and testimony about the case from Bragg and his office. Bragg has rejected those requests.

Many legal experts have come forward since Trump’s indictment and argued that Bragg’s case is fragile.

“The question to ask yourself in a case like this [is], ‘Would a case like this be brought against anybody else, whether he or she be president, former president or a regular citizen?’ The answer is… no,” Former Whitewater deputy counsel Sol Wisenberg said.

“You can debate all day long whether or not… Trump should be indicted related to the records at Mar-a-Lago, whether or not he should be indicted with respect to Jan. 6 incitement of lawless activity… Those are real crimes if they occurred, and he committed them,” he said. “This is preposterous.”

Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox, wrote: “There is something painfully anticlimactic about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s indictment of former President Trump. It concerns not Trump’s efforts to overthrow the duly elected government of the United States, but his alleged effort to cover up a possible extramarital affair with a porn star. And there’s a very real risk that this indictment will end in an even bigger anticlimax. It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.”

Mark Stern, a writer for the liberal outlet Slate, published a story titled “The Trump Indictment Is Not the Slam-Dunk Case Democrats Wanted.”

The entire thing could backfire on the Democrats badly, if the people of New York were ever to engage in reality about what their lives have become under the corrupt Democrat leadership.

Consider this point of view:

Democrats do the most bizarre things with their freedom, like trying to destroy a really great country.

Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

bout time the bag of wind got a pin stuck in him!!!!!!!

1 year ago

And the Democrats do a really strange thing…like destroy a REALLY FANTASTIC PRESIDENT. Dumb asses to the inth degree.

1 year ago

Bragg deserves to fall flat on his face for his ill conceived efforts to run President Trump into the ground! Thanks for great elected officials like Jim Jordan!

1 year ago

I thought it was most appropriate that the judge used the phrase commonly used by democrats that “NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW”.