in ,

YES! FAKE NEWS YUGE!

Shocking New Evidence Shows Enough Potentially Fraudulent Votes To Prove Trump Won Georgia Election

Share this story:
  • 3.7K
    Shares

A stunning new report has revealed that there was likely enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia by persons who voted in counties they had already moved out of to overturn Biden’s 12,670 vote lead in November.

According to new evidence, more than 10,300 illicit votes were cast in Georgia’s general election in November 2020, a total that is certain to climb in the coming months, potentially surpassing the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

As The Federalist reports, residents must vote in the county where they live unless they move within 30 days of the election, according to Georgia law. Outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county where they no longer reside, “their vote in that county would be illegal,” according to Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer.

Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.

Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.

“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

And  new data from the Secretary of State’s office that further leads to this outcome:

While frustrated, Davis told me that he never stopped working on these issues. “In May I received an updated voter database from the Secretary of State’s office, and I imported the data and compared voter’s addresses to the NCOA information I processed in November.”

When Davis ran the data, he found that, of the approximately 35,000 Georgians who indicated they had moved from one county to another county more than 30 days before the November general election, as of May, more than 10,300 had updated their voter registration information, providing the secretary of state the exact address they had previously provided to the USPS. Those same 10,000-plus individuals all also cast ballots in the county in which they had previously lived.

“That number continues to increase every day as more and more people update their registrations,” Davis said. “I have little doubt that the total number will eventually meet and then exceed President Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia.” Davis, who has testified as an expert witness multiple times in disputed election cases, believes Trump might have won a challenge to the Georgia election results had a court actually heard his case.

“Under Georgia law, a judge can order an election be redone if he or she sees there were enough illegal, irregular, or improperly rejected votes to cast the results of the election in doubt, or if they see evidence of ‘systemic irregularities,’” Davis said.

“These issues were absolutely systemic,” Davis stressed, noting “they occurred in every county in the state, in every state house, state senate, and in every congressional district in the state.”

Evans, who holds the distinction of being the only lawyer in Georgia history to successfully overturn two elections in the same race, concurred. Under Georgia law, Evans explained, “an election should be overturned either if (1) more votes than decided the election were illegal, wrongfully rejected or irregular, or (2) when there were systemic irregularities that cast in doubt the results of the election.”

“In the case of the 2020 general election,” Evans told me, Davis’s analysis indicates both factors could have been in play.

This is exactly the kind of fraud that comes from sending out absentee ballots to voters who don’t request them, which is what Georgia did in the 2020 election.

Now obviously the vote count isn’t there yet for these two experts to say assuredly that there are enough fraudulent votes to overturn the election, but it’s very close and will probably get there soon. But that said, don’t expect a judge to call for a new 2020 presidential election in the state. As the author of this report, Margot Cleveland, points out:

While this evidence does not change the fact that Joe Biden is our president, all Americans who genuinely care about free and fair elections and the disenfranchisement of voters should demand both transparency and solutions to prevent a repeat in future elections. This evidence also vindicates former President Trump and his legal team for the related public (and private) comments and legal arguments made in challenging the Georgia election results.

It is absolutely about sunlight and that is crucial. But it not only vindicates Trump’s claims, it also provides more proof that Georgia was right to ban state and local governments from sending out unsolicited absentee ballots in the future, which is part of the law that Biden’s DOJ is challenging in court.

  • 3.7K
    Shares

 

 

Leave a Reply

Loading…