Despite analysis supporting a varied media mix for political advertising, a recent study has determined that of the $9 billion spent on ads for the 2018 midterms, only the portion invested in traditional TV ads had a significant effect.
From Daily Caller:
Political media buyers have long been challenged to abandon the age-old “TV first” strategy and embrace new platforms and technology, according to a Washington Post article during the 2018 midterm elections. Research proving consumer media fragmentation, along with constant sales pitches touting expanded digital advertising capabilities overwhelm strategists already hesitant to abandon proven vehicles.
Forbes Magazine detailed how 2018 political media spending was divided between various mediums. Of the $9 billion spent, $4.6 billion went to television (broadcast and cable), $1.7 billion to various digital platforms, $689 million for radio and $625 million was spent on print ads including direct mail.
Media consultants can breathe easier, according to a study published recently by the Television Bureau of Advertising (TVB). After the 2018 elections, the TVB surveyed 10,000 registered voters across 10 key markets to find out what advertising medium most influenced their choice on election day. TV was the winner, hands down. Sixty-six percent of the respondents said that TV motivated them to get out and vote.
Respondents were asked about ad exposure across 20 mediums including outdoor and robocalls. Not only did TV prove to be 10-15 times more effective than any other platform, but voters also credited TV for driving them to online media for additional information.
